| DR PETER COX (Hadley
Centre, Met Office): We're gonna be in a
situation unless we act where the
cooling pollutant is dropping off while
the warming pollutant is going up, CO2
will be going up and particles will be
dropping off and that means we'll get an
accelerated warming. We'll get a double
whammy, we'll get, we'll get reducing
cooling and increased heating at the
same time and that's, that's a problem
for us. NARRATOR David Attenborrough: And that's not all.
Climatologists like Peter Cox have begun
to worry that Global Dimming has led
them to underestimate the true power of
global warming. They fear that the Earth
could be far more vulnerable to
greenhouse gases than they had
previously thought.
DR PETER COX: We've got two competing
effects really, that we've got the
greenhouse effect, which has tended to
warm up the climate. But then we've got
this other effect that's much stronger
than we thought, which is a cooling
effect that comes from particles in the
atmosphere. And they're competing with
one another. And we know the climate's
moved to a warmer state by about point
six of a degree over the last hundred
years. So the whole thing's moved this
way. If it turns out that the cooling is
stronger than we thought then the
warming also is a lot stronger than we
thought, and that means the climate's
more sensitive to carbon dioxide than we
originally thought, and it means our
models may be under sensitive to carbon
dioxide.
NARRATOR: The models that everyone
has been using to forecast climate
change predict a maximum warming of 5
degrees by the end of the century. But
Cox and his colleagues now fear those
models may be wrong. Temperatures could
rise twice as fast as they previously
thought with irreversible damage just
twenty-five years away.
DR PETER COX: If we don't do anything
by about twenty thirty we could have a
global warming of exceeding two degrees,
and at that point it's believed the
Greenland ice sheet would start to melt
in a way that you wouldn't be able to
stop it once it started it, it would
melt. Take a long time to melt but
ultimately it would lead to a sea level
rise of seven or eight metres.
NARRATOR: Once the Greenland ice cap
begins to melt, nothing will stop it.
Many of the world's major cities will be
living on borrowed time. Decade by
decade, the risk of catastrophic
flooding would increase inexorably. But
unless action is taken it won't stop
there. Because after Greenland, the
world's tropical rainforests will start
to wither in the heat.
DR PETER COX: 2040 it could be four
degrees warmer, the climate change could
have led to big drying particularly in
the Amazon Basin, that would make the
forest unsustainable, we'd expect the
forest to catch fire probably, turn into
savannah and maybe ultimately even
desert if it gets really really dry as
our model suggests.
NARRATOR: And as the rainforest burnt
away, it would release vast amounts of
carbon dioxide into the atmosphere,
driving global warming still further.
Cox calculates that in just a century,
the world could be 10 degrees hotter, a
warming more rapid than any in Earth
history. If this were to happen, the
landscape of England would be utterly
transformed.
DR PETER COX: We're talking about a
change from er a lush, moist climate,
environment like this, to a North
African climate in just a few decades or
a hundred years.
NARRATOR: Most British plant species
could not survive a North African
climate. With vegetation dying
everywhere, soil erosion would become a
severe problem. From a green and
pleasant land, England would become a
country of extremes, with winter
flooding giving way to summer dust
storms. And it will be far worse
elsewhere.
DR PETER COX: You can imagine ten
degree warming in the UK in a hundred
years is catastrophic. Ten degree
warming in a hot country already makes
it essentially uninhabitable.
NARRATOR: And just when one might
think things could get no worse in the
far North a ten degree warming might be
enough to release a vast natural store
of greenhouse gas bigger than all the
oil and coal reserves of the planet.
DR PETER COX: We will be in danger of
destabilising these things called
methane hydrates which store a lot of
methane at the bottom of the ocean in a
kind of frozen form, ten thousand
billions tons of this stuff, and they're
known to be destabilised by warming.
NARRATOR: At this point, whatever we
did to curb our emissions, it would be
too late. Ten thousand billion tons of
methane, a greenhouse gas eight times
stronger than carbon dioxide, would be
released into the atmosphere. The
Earth's climate would be spinning out of
control, heading towards temperatures
unseen in four billion years. But this
is not a prediction - it is a warning.
It is what will happen if we clean up
pollution while doing nothing about
greenhouse gases. However, the easy
solution - just keep on polluting and
hope that Global Dimming will protect us
- would be suicidal.
DR PETER COX: If we carried on
pumping out the particles it would have
terrible impact on human health, I mean
particles are involved in all sorts of
respiratory diseases, that's why they're
being brought under control, and of
course they effect climate anyway. If
you, if you fiddle with the, the balance
of the planet, the radiative balance of
the planet, you affect all sorts of
circulation patterns like monsoons,
which would have horrible effects on
people. So it would be extremely
difficult, in fact impossible, to cancel
out the greenhouse effect just by
carrying on pumping out particles, even
if it wasn't for the fact that particles
are damaging for human health.
NARRATOR: Instead we have to take
urgent action to tackle the root cause
of both global warming and Global
Dimming - the burning of coal, oil and
gas. We may have to make very difficult
choices, about how we live and how we
generate our electricity. We have been
talking about such things for 20 years.
But so far very little has been done in
practical terms. The discovery of Global
Dimming makes it clear that we are
rapidly running out of time.
DR PETER COX: One of the real driving
forces is that you leave an environment
that is comfortable for your children.
And we carry on going the way we're
going, we're not going to do that, we're
going to leave an environment that's
much worse than the environment we lived
in; and it will be down to what we did
when we were using that environment, and
that would be, um, tragic really, if
that happened. |